Continued abuse of our services will cause your IP address to be blocked indefinitely. Please fill out the CAPTCHA below and then click the button to indicate that you agree to these terms. If you wish to be unblocked, you must agree that you will take immediate steps to rectify this issue. If you do not understand what is causing this behavior, please contact us here. If you promise to stop (by clicking the Agree button below), we'll unblock your connection for now, but we will immediately re-block it if we detect additional bad behavior.
The furniture dealer is liable for the tax and must calculate and pay the. Overusing our search engine with a very large number of searches in a very short amount of time who meet the economic nexus thresholds discussed in Chapter 2 must hold a.Using a badly configured (or badly written) browser add-on for blocking content.Running a "scraper" or "downloader" program that either does not identify itself or uses fake headers to elude detection.Using a script or add-on that scans GameFAQs for box and screen images (such as an emulator front-end), while overloading our search engine.There is no official GameFAQs app, and we do not support nor have any contact with the makers of these unofficial apps. Continued use of these apps may cause your IP to be blocked indefinitely. This triggers our anti-spambot measures, which are designed to stop automated systems from flooding the site with traffic. Some unofficial phone apps appear to be using GameFAQs as a back-end, but they do not behave like a real web browser does.Using GameFAQs regularly with these browsers can cause temporary and even permanent IP blocks due to these additional requests. If you are using Maxthon or Brave as a browser, or have installed the Ghostery add-on, you should know that these programs send extra traffic to our servers for every page on the site that you browse.
The most common causes of this issue are:
I suspect the difference in results has to do with the type of containers I used as well as the fact the volume of an M&M varies from sample to sample.Your IP address has been temporarily blocked due to a large number of HTTP requests. I also felt that the 0.685 value was more reasonable based on my research. I didn't want to use my own value to derive the formula because I wanted something to compare the results of my experiment to. This does differ from the packing ratios that I calculated from my own experiment which hovered around 0.67. This was based on the results of a group of students' experiments. I found a paper on the University of Delaware's Department of Mathematical Sciences website that stated that the packing ratio of an M&M (spheroid) is 0.685. Thanks!Ĭhristopher Wanamaker (author) from Arizona on May 15, 2013: Interesting hub! With this formula at hand, I can finally confront interviewers who ask questions like how many M&M's into this container, etc. Math!įrienderal from Singapore on June 11, 2014: I've seen these contests around town and have often wondered how anyone could possibly get close to the correct answer. I have more experience with money than candy! Fascinating hub, will share!Īrco Hess from Kansas City, Kansas on October 08, 2014: I've never tried guessing the candy, but I won a lunch once for estimating how many dollars worth of dimes were in a jar. Interesting! I thought it was just a matter of taking a wild guess! Or filling up a similar sized container then counting the M&M's. Jayme Kinsey from Oklahoma on November 20, 2014: Patsy Bell Hobson from zone 6a, Southeast Missouri, USA on November 20, 2014: (Note: There seems to be one typo error for the second formula under the section “A Lone Blogger's Quart M&M Estimate”, where the statement “where the container's volume (V) is in fluid ounces” should be “where the container's volume (V) is in milliliters.”) As you have rightly done, one of the critical factors that determine the formula accuracy is the “container shapes and sizes”, that can greatly affect how well or the number of the items (M&M’s) that can be packed into these various-shaped containers. Interesting simplified formula you have derived for this computation, with a sufficiently good accuracy for this purpose.
0 kommentar(er)
